Judge dismisses claims that New York lawsuit is a “witch hunt.” Judge Joel Cohen swiftly dismissed the NRA’s claims that the New York lawsuit against it is a “malicious retaliation campaign,” allowing the lawsuit to move forward. This is yet another blow to the NRA in Attorney General James’s two-year lawsuit. A judge has allowed New York Attorney General Letitia James to continue seeking two large penalties against the NRA: millions in back-salary from its CEO, Wayne LaPierre, and an independent monitor who would oversee the gun lobby’s finances. Court ruling allows New York attorney general to seek hefty penalties from NRA.This slump is even more significant given there is a Democrat who supports stronger gun laws in the White House, which typically fuels donations. Far fewer NRA members donated large amounts than previously, with the number of donations totaling more than $200 dropping 45% from the 2018 midterms. NRA PAC donations plummeted before the 2022 midterms.After no action was taken, on November 2, 2021, Giffords sued the NRA. In October 2021, a federal judge ruled that the FEC has 30 days to take action on the complaints. The FEC has dragged its feet on addressing these allegations, so Giffords and CLC sought to compel the agency to investigate these millions of dollars in illegal, unreported, and excessive in-kind contributions by filing a lawsuit against the FEC. The group spent $25 million, mostly on television ads, through the same companies-and often the same executives-who placed spots for the Trump campaign, violating well-established campaign finance laws. Giffords and CLC also filed FEC complaints documenting illegal campaign coordination involving the NRA and the Trump presidential campaign. Four complaints filed at the Federal Election Commission (FEC) by the Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and Giffords accused the NRA of illegally coordinating with the campaigns of multiple GOP senate candidates in the 2014, 2016, and 2018 election cycles. According to a broad range of election and advertising records, the NRA appears to have illegally coordinated with multiple political campaigns-violating federal law that prevents independent groups from synchronizing their efforts with campaigns. Originally released in July 2019, we’re continuing to update this list so we can all make sense of the extent of the NRA’s disarray. How did we get here? The trail is long and full of infighting, flirting with foreign governments, and cuts to the office coffee budget. The NRA seems to be teetering on the brink, hemorrhaging both money and support. Mark Walker’s campaign spent a combined $200 on membership fees to the NRA in October and November.Over the past year, stories about the National Rifle Association (NRA) have spilled into the light of day, painting a picture of an organization in disarray. Trent Kelly’s campaign spent $750 on NRA membership in December 2017, while North Carolina GOP Rep. Fleming is an official at the Department of Health and Human Services. A Trump administration political appointee, John Fleming, was among nine former members of Congress whose campaign committees also paid for NRA membership. senators and nine current members of the House have used campaign money to pay the cost of membership to the powerful gun rights lobby or its related entities since 2004, with the outlays ranging from $25 to $1,500, according to Federal Election Commission records. In some cases, though, the funds flow the other way, too: Lawmakers use campaign money to pay membership dues to the organization. Many members of Congress receive campaign donations from the National Rifle Association. A participant at gun rights rally at the Capitol in Olympia, Wash.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |